Multidimensional assessment of adverse events of bupropion: A large-scale data analysis from the FAERS database.

OBJECTIVE: Bupropion, a monocyclic antidepressant, aids in smoking cessation, treats major depression, and prevents severe depression in seasonal affective disorder patients. Yet, its adverse reactions remain insufficiently studied. METHODS: All data from the raw data packages for 78 quarters from the 1st quarter of 2004 to the 2nd quarter of 2023 were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and imported into the SAS9.4 software for data cleaning and analysis. The Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) methods were used to analyze drug adverse events and assess their compliance with various screening criteria. RESULTS: The results showed a total of 36,862 reports related to Bupropion use, identifying 364 positive reaction terms (PT) covering 23 System Organ Classes (SOCs). In addition to known side effects, some new potential adverse reactions were found, such as Stool analysis abnormal, Oculocephalogyric reflex absent, Suspected suicide, and so on. At the same time, reactions like Encephalopathy neonatal, Hyponatraemic coma, and Electrocardiogram QRS complex prolonged were prominently ranked. Notably, occurrences such as Urine amphetamine positive and Amphetamines positive were relatively high, suggesting extra caution for these potential adverse reactions during clinical use of Bupropion. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential health risks of long-term Bupropion use, especially concerning efficacy, positive drug tests, and suicidal tendencies. Therefore, it is recommended to monitor and assess patients using Bupropion more stringently to use this therapeutically potential drug more safely and effectively.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Smoking Cessation Interventions in the United Kingdom Accounting for Major Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events.

OBJECTIVES: Smoking is a leading cause of death worldwide. Cessation aids include varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and e-cigarettes at various doses (low, standard and high) and used alone or in combination with each other. Previous cost-effectiveness analyses have not fully accounted for adverse effects nor compared all cessation aids. The objective was to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of cessation aids in the United Kingdom. METHODS: An established Markov cohort model was adapted to incorporate health outcomes and costs due to depression and self-harm associated with cessation aids, alongside other health events. Relative efficacy in terms of abstinence and major adverse neuropsychiatric events was informed by a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Base case results are reported for UK-licensed interventions only. Two sensitivity analyses are reported, one including unlicensed interventions and another comparing all cessation aids but removing the impact of depression and self-harm. The sensitivity of conclusions to model inputs was assessed by calculating the expected value of partial perfect information. RESULTS: When limited to UK-licensed interventions, varenicline standard-dose and NRT standard-dose were most cost-effective. Including unlicensed interventions, e-cigarette low-dose appeared most cost-effective followed by varenicline standard-dose + bupropion standard-dose combined. When the impact of depression and self-harm was excluded, varenicline standard-dose + NRT standard-dose was most cost-effective, followed by varenicline low-dose + NRT standard-dose. CONCLUSION: Although found to be most cost-effective, combined therapy is currently unlicensed in the United Kingdom and the safety of e-cigarettes remains uncertain. The value-of-information analysis suggested researchers should continue to investigate the long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes of e-cigarettes in studies with active comparators.

Pharmacovigilance Assessment of Cardiac Implications of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Among Smokers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quantitative comparative study was to examine the possible relationship between nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and cardiac disorder risk by comparing the rates of cardiac disorder risk of NRT with cardiac disorder risk of non-replacement drugs among smokers seeking smoking cessation. METHODS: The study used retrospective quantitative design, which involved the collection of secondary data from the adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Rates of cardiac disorder were compared between the NRT group and non- NRT (varenicline and bupropion) group. Statistical analyses involved using a 2x2 contingency table and logistic regression to calculate odds ratio (reporting odds ratio (ROR)). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Unadjusted ROR was 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28, 0.70). With age and sex as confounding factors, the smokers in the NRT group still had lower odds of having cardiac disorder risk than the non-NRT group (adjusted ROR=0.44, 95% CI 0.28, 0.70). CONCLUSION: Our study findings showed lower cardiac disorder risk with the NRT group compared to the non-NRT (varenicline and bupropion) group. While the study did not aim to undermine either using NRT or non-NRT for smoking cessation therapy to prevent smoking illness, the study results offer informed findings that could potentially improve current smoking cessation management using NRT intervention among smokers and enhance smokers' health outcome. Despite the negative signal detection of cardiac disorder risk with NRT as compared to non-NRT in final findings, we still recommend further research on the causal relationship between NRT and non-NRT and cardiac disorder risk.

Safety assessment of combination therapies in the treatment of obesity: focus on naltrexone/bupropion extended release and phentermine-topiramate extended release.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies on combination therapies for the treatment of obesity had been conducted until recently, when two fixed-dose combinations, bupropion-naltrexone ER fixed-dose combination and phentermine-topiramate ER titrated-dose combinations were evaluated in clinical studies that ultimately led to FDA approval. Areas covered: In this review, we discuss safety concerns about both combinations, the rationale and history of combination therapies for obesity (including phentermine plus fenfluramine), and possible future new combinations. Expert opinion: Combination therapies are a promising new area in obesity treatment, similar to what occurs with diabetes and hypertension. Safety assessment is highly important due to the high number of potential users on a chronic basis.

Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on counseling and interventions to prevent tobacco use and tobacco-related disease in adults, including pregnant women. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation that are relevant to primary care (behavioral interventions, pharmacotherapy, and complementary or alternative therapy) in adults, including pregnant women. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to adults aged 18 years or older, including pregnant women. RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all adults about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions and U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy for cessation to adults who use tobacco. (A recommendation). The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all pregnant women about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions for cessation to pregnant women who use tobacco. (A recommendation). The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco cessation in pregnant women. (I statement). The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to recommend electronic nicotine delivery systems for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant women. The USPSTF recommends that clinicians direct patients who smoke tobacco to other cessation interventions with established effectiveness and safety (previously stated). (I statement).

Eficacia y seguridad del uso de medicamentos para la cesación de la adicción al tabaco: revisión de guías de práctica clínica / Efficacy and safety of medication use for the cessation of tobacco addiction: Are view of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Objetivo Revisar la eficacia y seguridad de medicamentos para cesación del tabaquismo en el contexto de construcción de guías de práctica clínica (GPC). Métodos Revisión sistemática de GPC para adaptación mediante ADAPTE. Los desenlaces fueron cesación ≥6 meses y seguridad de las intervenciones. Las GPC se calificaron por pares con DELBI. Se extrajeron resultados de estudios agregativos incluidos en las guías seleccionadas. Resultados Los fármacos duplican la cesación comparados con placebo (tasas de 25,0 % hasta 27,0 % al combinarse con consejería). Los mayores incrementos en cesación se obtienen con ansiolíticos y antidepresivos (8,7% a 19,4%), y los menores con terapia de reemplazo nicotínico -TRN- (5,2% a 12,9%). La nortriptilina tiene eficacia similar al bupropion (aproximadamente 10,0 %). Con limitadas excepciones (parche e inhalador, tabletas y bupropion), las combinaciones de medicamentos no incrementan la abstinencia. Conclusiones TRN, vareniclina, bupropion y nortriptilina son eficaces para dejar de fumar. Las combinaciones de medicamentos requieren más evidencia y deberían restringirse a personas con alta dependencia o con falla terapéutica inicial. Serían deseables análisis de costo-efectividad para valorar implementación de programas en países en desarrollo.

Objective To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. Results Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. Conclusions NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.

Cardiovascular and mortality risks in older Medicare patients treated with varenicline or bupropion for smoking cessation: an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: To compare cardiovascular and mortality risks in elderly patients treated with varenicline or bupropion for smoking cessation. METHODS: Elderly Medicare beneficiaries were entered into new-user cohorts of varenicline or bupropion for smoking cessation and followed on therapy for primary outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, mortality, and a composite of any of these events. Secondary outcomes were unstable angina, coronary revascularization, and a composite of any primary or secondary outcome event. Propensity score stratification was used to adjust for baseline differences in potential confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards, with bupropion as reference. RESULTS: In cohorts of 74 824 varenicline and 14 133 bupropion users, there were 164 AMI, 96 stroke, 87 death, 317 primary composite, and 814 secondary composite events while on therapy. The HRs (95%CI) were 0.79 (0.50-1.24) for AMI, 1.27 (0.63-2.55) for stroke, 0.58 (0.30-1.13) for death, 0.84 (0.58-1.23) for the primary composite, and 0.92 (0.73-1.14) for the secondary composite. The risk of AMI or the primary composite outcome did not differ in subgroups defined by age, diabetes status, or presence of underlying ischemic heart disease. Only 30% of patients remained on either study drug beyond their first prescription. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular and mortality risks were not increased in older patients treated with varenicline compared with bupropion for smoking cessation. A potential increase in the risk of stroke with varenicline could not be excluded. Treatment persistence with either drug was low. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

[Efficacy and safety of medication use for the cessation of tobacco addiction: A review of Clinical Practice Guidelines]. / Eficacia y seguridad del uso de medicamentos para la cesación de la adicción al tabaco: revisión de guías de práctica clínica.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). METHODS: A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. RESULTS: Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. CONCLUSIONS: NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.

[Results of a multidisciplinary program to quit smoking]. / Resultados de un programa multidisciplinario para el control del hábito tabáquico.

BACKGROUND: Therapies to quit smoking are based on counseling, psychological therapy (PT), nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenidine. AIM: To report the results of a multidisciplinary program to quit smoking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients aged l8 years or more, motivated to quit smoking were admitted in a program based in counseling and PT, with or without pharmacological therapy. They were assessed by telephone during one year of follow up. Patients with unstable psychiatric diseases were excluded. Results were considered as "successful" when patients maintained abstinence during the year of follow up. A logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with treatment success. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2011, 198 patients aged 45 ± 11 years (56% males), who smoked 31.5 ± 20.6 packages/year, were treated. Of these, 155 (78%) were treated with varenidine, 26 (13%) with bupropion and 17 (9%>) did not receive pharmacological therapy. One hundred sixty eight patients completed the year of follow up. In 82 (49%>), treatment was successful and was negatively associated with a history of depression (odds ratio = 4 (95% confidence intervals 1.23-38.33). The main side effeets associated to varenidine and bupropion were nausea in 37 and 23%o, sleep disorders in 20 and 19%o and headache in 12 and 0%>, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary program to quit smoking achieved a 49%> of abstinence during a year of follow up.

Action to stop smoking in suspected tuberculosis (ASSIST) in Pakistan: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is responsible for a large proportion of the total disease burden from tuberculosis. Pakistan is one of the 10 high-burden countries for both tuberculosis and tobacco use. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a behavioral support intervention and bupropion in achieving 6-month continuous abstinence in adult smokers with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. DESIGN: Cluster randomized, controlled trial. (Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN08829879) SETTING: Health centers in the Jhang and Sargodha districts in Pakistan. PATIENTS: 1955 adult smokers with suspected tuberculosis. INTERVENTION: Health centers were randomly assigned to provide 2 brief behavioral support sessions (BSS), BSS plus 7 weeks of bupropion therapy (BSS+), or usual care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was continuous abstinence at 6 months after the quit date and was determined by carbon monoxide levels in patients. Secondary end points were point abstinence at 1 and 6 months. RESULTS: Both treatments led to statistically significant relative risks (RRs) for abstinence compared with usual care (RR for BSS+, 8.2 [95% CI, 3.7 to 18.2]; RR for BSS, 7.4 [CI, 3.4 to 16.4]). Equivalence between the treatments could not be established. In the BSS+ group, 275 of 606 patients (45.4% [CI, 41.4% to 49.4%]) achieved continuous abstinence compared with 254 of 620 (41.0% [CI, 37.1% to 45.0%]) in the BSS group and 52 of 615 (8.5% [CI, 6.4% to 10.9%]) in the usual care group. There was substantial heterogeneity of program effects across clusters. LIMITATIONS: Imbalances in the urban and rural proportions and smoking habits among treatment groups, and inability to confirm adherence to bupropion treatment and validate longer-term abstinence or the effect of smoking cessation on tuberculosis outcomes. CONCLUSION: Behavioral support alone or in combination with bupropion is effective in promoting cessation in smokers with suspected tuberculosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: International Development Research Centre.

Resultados de un programa multidisciplinario para el control del hábito tabáquico / Results of a multidisciplinary program to quit smoking

Background: Therapies to quit smoking are based on counseling, psychological therapy (PT), nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenidine. Aim: To report the results of a multidisciplinary program to quit smoking Material and Methods: Patients agedl8years or more, motivated to quit smoking were admitted in a program based in counseling and PT, with or without pharmacological therapy. They were assessed by telephone during one year offollow up. Patients with unstable psychiatric diseases were excluded. Results were considered as "successful" when patients maintained abstinence during the year offollow up. A logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with treatment success. Results: Between 2005 and 2011, 198 patients aged 45 ± 11 years (56% males), who smoked 31.5 ± 20.6 packages/year, were treated. Ofthese, 155 (78%) were treated with varenidine, 26 (13%) with bupropion and 17 (9%>) did not receive pharmacological therapy. One hundred sixty eightpatients completed the year offollow up. In 82 (49%>), treatment was successful and was negatively associated with a history of depression (odds ratio = 4 (95% confidence intervals 1.23-38.33). The main side effeets associated to varenidine and bupropion were nausea in 37 and 23%o, sleep disorders in 20 and 19%o and headache in 12 and 0%>, respectively Conclusions: A multidisciplinary program to quit smoking achieved a 49%> of abstinence during a year offollow up.

Do suicidal thoughts or behaviors recur during a second antidepressant treatment trial?

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients undergoing initial antidepressant treatment experience worsening of symptoms, including thoughts of suicide or suicidal behavior. The present study explores whether this subset of patients is also more likely to experience recurrence or worsening of these symptoms during a second treatment trial with a different antidepressant. METHOD: We examined data collected between July 2001 and September 2006 from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, a multicenter effectiveness study of outpatients with major depressive disorder diagnosed by a DSM-IV checklist. In that study, subjects who did not remit with citalopram treatment were randomized among next-step treatment options. The main outcome measure for this post hoc analysis, presence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, was assessed using the suicide item on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology--Self-Rated. Logistic regression was used to examine association between emergence or worsening of these symptoms with the first-step (level 1) citalopram treatment and emergence or worsening with next-step (level 2) pharmacologic or psychosocial treatment, including augmentation with bupropion or buspirone; switch to sertraline, venlafaxine, or bupropion; or addition of or switch to cognitive therapy. RESULTS: Of 1,240 subjects entering level 2 with a score less than 3 on the suicide item, 102 (8.2%) experienced emergence or worsening of suicidal thoughts or behaviors. Emergence or worsening at level 1 was strongly associated with reemergence or worsening at level 2 (crude OR = 4.00 [95% CI, 2.45-6.51], adjusted OR = 2.95 [95% CI, 1.76-4.96]). Overall magnitude of risk was similar among next-step pharmacologic augmentation versus switching. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that individuals who experience emergence or worsening of suicidal thoughts or behaviors with one antidepressant treatment may warrant closer follow-up during the next-step treatment, as these symptoms may recur regardless of which modality is selected.

The effect of pharmacotherapy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on risk of seizures in pediatric patients as assessed in an insurance claims database.

PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of new-onset seizure in ADHD patients in relation to ADHD pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 34,727 patients, ages 6 to 17, with at least two insurance claims bearing ADHD diagnoses during 2003 in the UnitedHealthcare database. Incidence of seizure was calculated for observation time during treatment with atomoxetine and stimulants/bupropion. RESULTS: Seizure incidence among ADHD patients was 4.5/1,000 person-years (p-y; 95% confidence interval 3.7 - 5.5). ADHD patients who received any ADHD medication had an incidence of 3.8/1,000 p-y (3.0 - 4.8) compared to 8.7 (5.8 - 12.4) for patients who did not receive any ADHD medication. The relative risk (RR) for current vs non-use of atomoxetine was 1.1 (0.6 - 2.1). For stimulants and bupropion, the RR for current vs non-use was 0.8 (0.6 - 1.3). Elevated seizure risks were found in association with central nervous system (CNS) disease (OR 3.9, 1.2 - 10.9), CNS medications (OR 2.2, 1.3 - 3.6), metabolic disease (OR 2.9, 1.1 - 6.8), and psychiatric disease risk factors (OR 1.7, 1.1 - 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no statistically significant association between use of atomoxetine or stimulants and seizure risk in children ages 6 to 17 years with ADHD and without prior seizure disorder.

The influence of primary care prescribing rates for new drugs on spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting makes a vital contribution to pharmacovigilance, although the factors that influence the reporting rate remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the variation in the rate of reporting of suspected ADRs in different regions of Scotland was explained by differences in local prescribing practice and to quantify the extent of this influence. METHODS: Population and primary care prescribing data were obtained for ten geographical areas based on the 15 administrative regions of the National Health Service in Scotland. All reports of suspected ADRs received from within Scotland for 2000 and 2001 were available from the regional monitoring centre (Committee on Safety of Medicines, Scotland). The primary analysis was based on 14 medications that appeared in the 'top ten' list for the frequency of reported ADRs for either year. Reporting rates for each area were expressed both in terms of population (reports per million people) and in terms of estimated exposure to those medications in primary care (reports per 1000 prescriptions). For each analysis, the Pearson correlation coefficient between reporting and prescribing data was calculated using SPSS software. RESULTS: The 'top ten' medications accounted for 1715 of 2817 (60.9%, 95% CI 59.1, 62.7) ADR reports but only 2.2 million out of a total of 128 million primary care prescriptions (1.7%). Although there was a 3-fold geographical variation in the per-population ADR reporting rate, there was a close correlation between local reporting of ADRs and prescribing of the index medications (p = 0.66, p = 0.04, respectively). This implies that 44% of the observed variation in reporting rate can be attributed to variation in prescribing within the same population. DISCUSSION: Spontaneous ADR reporting in Scotland over the 2 years studied was highly concentrated on a small number of medications that were under intensive surveillance. Although there was a 3-fold variation in reporting rates from individual geographic areas when corrected for the size of the population, primary care prescribing data showed nearly half of this local variation in reporting rates could be explained by differences in prescribing. This study highlights the importance of considering prescribing practice when interpreting spontaneous ADR reporting data.

An assessment of patient preference and adherence to treatment with Wellbutrin SR: a web-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that lack of treatment adherence is a serious problem, especially among patients with psychiatric disorders. The current study was conducted to assess adherence and patient preference among individuals taking Wellbutrin SR (bupropion) for depression, as well as their interest in a once-daily formulation of bupropion. METHODS: A 20-item web-based survey was administered to 527 individuals (276 men and 251 women) recruited through an online panel. All participants were at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and had been taking Wellbutrin SR for at least 6 weeks. Survey items addressed treatment regimen, adherence, satisfaction with Wellbutrin SR, and interest in a once-daily formulation of bupropion. RESULTS: The majority of respondents reported taking Wellbutrin SR twice a day (67%). Only 15% of once-daily users were nonadherent compared to 37% of twice-daily users and 65% of thrice-daily users. The most common reason reported for missing a dose of Wellbutrin SR was simply forgetting to take it (49% of twice-daily users and 65% of thrice-daily users). Results indicated that 77% of twice-daily users and 94% of thrice-daily users were interested in a once-daily formula. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in dosing frequency is favored by Wellbutrin SR users and likely to improve their adherence to treatment. Because greater adherence has been shown to facilitate symptom relief, improvements in quality of life, and reductions in healthcare expenses, the results of this study support the value of the recently released once-daily formulation, Wellbutrin XL.

Bupropion: risks and benefits.

Cigarette smoking represents one of the most preventable causes of death worldwide. However, success rates for stopping smoking are disappointingly low and are associated with high relapse rates. There is a need for a successful form of smoking cessation therapy. Bupropion is an effective therapy for smoking cessation and is recommended as first-line treatment in both US and UK guidelines. Its mechanism of action in smoking cessation is unclear, although it is thought that dopaminergic pathways are involved in the 'reward' circuit of drug dependence. Seizures are an important adverse effect of bupropion and care is needed when used in other conditions or with other medication that can lower the seizure threshold. Bupropion has been shown to be a cost-effective therapy for smoking cessation.

Conversion from sustained-release to immediate-release bupropion: patient tolerability and economic impact.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess patient tolerability and impact on institutional drug acquisition costs of converting patients from sustained-release bupropion to generic immediate-release bupropion. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred three outpatients who had been receiving sustained-release bupropion and were converted to immediate-release bupropion at equal individual doses and frequencies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were reviewed for documentation of adverse effects thought to be associated with bupropion treatment; reports of seizure occurrence were specifically sought. Patterns of bupropion dosing were also assessed. Institutional drug acquisition costs were evaluated by comparing actual costs of bupropion for each patient before and after conversion. Adverse effects reported with immediate-release bupropion were those commonly associated with this drug (headache, agitation, chest pain, and gastrointestinal complaints) and were neither unusually frequent nor severe. No seizures were reported after the drug conversion. Mean daily doses of bupropion were not significantly different after conversion. Mean single doses of immediate-release bupropion were below 150 mg; however, six patients did receive single doses of 200 mg. After conversion, the annual institutional drug acquisition cost for bupropion decreased by approximately $48,910. CONCLUSION: Conversion from sustained-release bupropion to immediate-release bupropion appears to be safe. Single 200-mg doses of immediate-release bupropion can apparently be administered to some patients without inducing excessive adverse effects, including seizures. Marked reduction in drug acquisition costs can be achieved with this conversion.